The Wolverine

Movie Review #744


Directed by James Mangold.  Screenplay by Mark Bomback and Scott Frank.  Produced by Hugh Jackman, Hutch Parker, and Lauren Shuler Donner for Donners’ Company, presented by Twentieth Century Fox, in association with Marvel Entertainment, made in association with TSG Entertainment and Ingenious Media, and produced in association with Big Screen Productions.  (Uncredited: Bad Hat Harry Productions.)  Starring Hugh Jackman as Logan, Tao Okamoto, Rila Fukushima, Hiroyuki Sanada, Svetlana Khodchenkova, Brian Tee, Haruhiko Yamanouchi, Will Yun Lee, Ken Yamamura, and Famke Janssen.  Credited cameos: Shinji Ikefuji, Hiroshi Kasuga, Kimi, Keiko Matsumoto.  Uncredited cameos: Ian McKellen as Magneto, Patrick Stewart as Charles Xavier.  Premiered in London on July 16, 2013.  Distributed by Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation in wide release on July 26, 2013.  Also released in the UK on July 25, 2013.  Rated PG-13: sequences of intense sci-fi action and violence, some sexuality and language.  Runs 126 minutes.  Extended Edition runs 138 minutes.

Cinemaniac Reviews three stars

Forgive me if I’m about to sound like a total geek. But it’s always fascinated me that the X-Men have been so often labelled as “superheroes.” Yes, they come out of comic books, but so does Tintin. Much like the X-Men, Tintin saves the day from time to time, but isn’t a superhero. Spider-Man is a superhero, mainly because he saves the entire city on multiple occasions. The X-Men are stated from the very beginning of the series to be “mutants,” not superheroes. Their story has always been about fighting for equality and not being seen as inferior.

But when Wolverine takes the stage, we can’t help but see him as a superhero. Maybe not so much in 2009’s “X-Men Origins: Wolverine”, as in 2013’s “The Wolverine”, a reboot that gives us a good lot of what we want of the character. It’s clear that this is its own story from the first ten minutes of the movie, and maybe even the title hints at it, too: this is the first in the X-Men series to not feature the word “X-Men” in the title.

And for an X-Men movie, “The Wolverine” breaks acres of new round. Actually, this really isn’t so much a movie of that series as we’ve expected. James Mangold has noted that the movie was inspired by roots of noir and western, and indeed “The Wolverine” draws more heavily from “Kill Bill”, “Blade Runner”, and “The Third Man” than it does Stan Lee. Maybe this movie most deviates from its comic booky nature by giving us an in-depth portrait of the Wolverine. The character is a spectacular idea, and for a while, a well executed one. Unfortunately, not everybody’s playing second fiddle to Jackman here. Jackman meets someone while he’s traveling abroad, I’m sorry, but that individual has to play second fiddle to him. I love seeing Hugh Jackman as a flawed hero, plagued by his past and endangered in his present, but when someone else is also given a backstory, they run the risk of seeming better than Hugh Jackman.

This wouldn’t matter if the emotional drama wasn’t such a huge part of “The Wolverine”, but it is. Fortunately, there’s the promised half of the movie for which Jackman is ringleader. Of course I’m referring to any one of the action sequences, which are all pretty familiar, and just so implausible, but well choreographed. The movie is set in Japan. I’m guessing that’s because some sort of karate started in Japan, so when everybody is depicted as a skilled martial artist who can put a samurai sword to good use, we’re used to the Hollywood stereotype. Okay, at this day and age, it’s not the most “politically correct” way to go about making a movie, but it’s still a whole lotta fun and excitement.

– Alexander Diminiano

Postscript: I just discovered that the wolverine is a member of the weasel family. The moniker sounds sadly unthreatening for Jackman, now that I’m aware of this.


5 thoughts on “The Wolverine

  1. Geek-out totally forgiven, because I’m also fascinated by what you mentioned in your first paragraph, but on the opposite end 🙂

    It seems to me that “mutant” and “superhero” are not mutually exclusive terms. The word “mutant” is a statement of biology, while “superhero” is a statement of ability (superhuman capabilities) and purpose (using said abilities for good or evil). So being a mutant doesn’t remove “superhero” as a possible label anymore than being a Kryptonian or an Asgardian would.

    So a mutant fighting for equality could be just as rightly labeled a superhero as a biologically altered teenager fighting crime. Make sense?

    Anyway, good review. I’m right with you on the rating there.

    • I get what you’re saying there and I agree, they’re not mutually exclusive, but X-men just don’t seem like superheroes to me at all. Maybe it’s ’cause the whole “mutant” thing is so frequently elaborated, or maybe it’s that they don’t look and act/interact like most superheroes, or maybe it’s something else. I’m really not sure. I just kind of go nuts when I hear them labelled as “superheroes” because it sounds so inaccurate to me.

      Thanks! Glad we agree here. 🙂

    • The funny thing about that is that I never really noticed it till here, and yet it’s probably REALLY prominent in Hollywood movies. I think I could say so for sure if I just watched “The Karate Kid” over again.

  2. Good review. Though it was fun and tense when it wanted to be, I was still surprised by how much it actually paid attention to the characters here. Logan in particular, giving us Jackman’s best-outing as this superhero yet.

Comments are closed.